Why Would A Reduction Of Livestock In The U.s. Not Likely Feed The World’s Hunger?
Saturday, February 27th, 2010Why would a reduction of livestock in the US not likely feed the world’s hunger?
Sponsored Links
Why would a reduction of livestock in the US not likely feed the world’s hunger?
Why would a reduction of livestock in the US not likely feed the world’s hunger?
Why would a reduction of livestock in the US not likely feed the world’s hunger?
Why would a reduction of livestock in the US not likely feed the world’s hunger?
It would cost around $400-$600. Where I am from a 50lb bag goes for about $10 (for horse feed).
It has to do with the energy transferred via trophic levels.
The general statement used is that every time you eat something, you only gain 10% of the energy it used/stored/had.
Most of the energy absorbed/synthesised by organisms are released as heat (especially in mammals) and used in other bodily processes.
So basically, when a plant uses photosynthesis [...]
altho will actually be using it for ethonal brewing
Try the Yahoo! Yellow Pages. I LOVE it for finding a certain type of business! yp.yahoo.com
Choose Other Professional Services, and then click on Animals and Pets. You should be able to find it from there.
Powered By Tractor P.T. O.
e.g. milk, old silage and old straw?
Thanks.